Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:00.029 --> 00:00:02.640
You're listening to the Nonprofit Power Podcast.
00:00:02.970 --> 00:00:05.070
In today's episode, we share.
00:00:05.339 --> 00:00:09.929
How to we equip your team to successfully communicate your best messaging?
00:00:10.259 --> 00:00:11.730
So stay tuned.
00:00:17.842 --> 00:00:26.792
If you want to have real and powerful influence over the money and policy decisions that impact your organization and the people you serve, then you're in the right place.
00:00:27.373 --> 00:00:40.353
I'm Kath Patrick and I've helped dozens of progressive nonprofit leaders take their organizations to new and higher levels of impact and success by building powerful influence with the decision makers that matter.
00:00:40.982 --> 00:00:49.372
It is possible to get a critical mass of the money and policy decision makers in your world to be as invested in your success as you are.
00:00:49.682 --> 00:00:52.203
To have them seeking you out as an equal partner.
00:00:52.643 --> 00:00:56.362
And to have them Bringing opportunities and resources to you.
00:00:56.972 --> 00:00:59.103
This podcast will help you do just that.
00:00:59.573 --> 00:01:02.402
Welcome to the Nonprofit Power Podcast.
00:01:08.084 --> 00:01:08.828
Hey everybody.
00:01:08.948 --> 00:01:13.299
Thank you so much for tuning into another episode of the Nonprofit Power podcast.
00:01:13.718 --> 00:01:15.129
I'm your host, Kath patrick.
00:01:15.549 --> 00:01:17.799
I'm so glad you're here for today's episode.
00:01:18.572 --> 00:01:30.512
Even when you've figured out the most effective messaging in the world, sharing that with the rest of your team and helping them to use it to produce the results you want can be a huge challenge.
00:01:31.201 --> 00:01:38.581
What definitely does not work is to simply provide all those talking points and say, here's everything in our messaging that works.
00:01:38.822 --> 00:01:39.512
Go do it.
00:01:40.015 --> 00:01:43.254
That's valuable information to have, but it is not enough.
00:01:43.912 --> 00:01:51.772
You may already have in your head all the details about when and where and how to most effectively deploy which pieces of that messaging.
00:01:52.462 --> 00:01:56.492
But you cannot assume that the rest of your team already knows that.
00:01:56.762 --> 00:01:58.682
In fact, they probably don't.
00:01:59.454 --> 00:02:05.905
In order for your team to effectively deploy your best messaging, they have to understand why it's the best.
00:02:06.355 --> 00:02:13.465
What each component is designed to accomplish, and when and how to use which pieces of it to greatest effect.
00:02:15.104 --> 00:02:18.104
I see over and over again, the following problem.
00:02:18.943 --> 00:02:26.774
There's a huge gap between the knowledge that the chief messaging architect in an organization has, and everyone else on the team.
00:02:27.584 --> 00:02:34.123
The CEO or the policy person or whoever in the organization is the primary architect of your advocacy messaging.
00:02:34.723 --> 00:02:42.424
They have developed the most successful messaging through a combination of strategic thinking, and trial and error.
00:02:43.054 --> 00:02:52.864
You do your best strategic thinking ahead of time, about what you know about your audience, about how they view the problem you solve, the value of your work and the impact that it makes.
00:02:53.463 --> 00:02:58.713
You do all that strategic thinking to formulate your most likely to succeed messaging.
00:02:59.313 --> 00:03:03.123
And then you go out and you use it in conversations with decision makers.
00:03:03.796 --> 00:03:05.296
And you find out what's missing.
00:03:05.794 --> 00:03:09.903
What lands and what doesn't, where things get misunderstood and so on.
00:03:10.804 --> 00:03:14.223
And then you go back and you improve that messaging.
00:03:14.973 --> 00:03:17.187
And this is a continuous cycle.
00:03:17.546 --> 00:03:21.687
Until you have messaging that is super dialed in and highly effective.
00:03:22.274 --> 00:03:31.139
And if you're the person who's been doing the bulk of the work to develop and test that messaging, you know far more about it than anyone else on your team.
00:03:32.106 --> 00:03:33.697
And here's what I see happen a lot.
00:03:34.236 --> 00:03:38.856
And it leads to a ton of frustration on the part of everybody involved.
00:03:39.456 --> 00:03:55.193
And that's the person who's the primary messaging architect and tester and experimenter, has all sorts of embedded knowledge and experience from both the strategic thinking behind the messaging, and from the results of that repeated experimentation and refinement.
00:03:55.883 --> 00:04:00.804
You've learned a ton in that process about what works and what doesn't.
00:04:01.223 --> 00:04:04.373
Under what circumstances and with what types of people.
00:04:05.093 --> 00:04:07.524
But your team didn't go through that experience.
00:04:07.554 --> 00:04:10.074
And so they don't have all that in their head.
00:04:11.093 --> 00:04:20.543
So, if you go to write down all the messaging for your team in whatever form you choose, whether you do it in slides, or you do it in a narrative or bullet points or whatever.
00:04:21.113 --> 00:04:25.973
And you lay it all out for the team and you say, here it is, this is the messaging we all need to be using.
00:04:26.797 --> 00:04:28.507
That is just step one.
00:04:29.040 --> 00:04:37.300
The reality is that's only about a quarter of what your team needs to be effective with their messaging on behalf of the organization and its work.
00:04:38.127 --> 00:04:50.697
What we tend to forget, if we've been the one who's been developing this brilliant messaging over time, is that each piece of that messaging is designed to work with a particular audience in a particular situation.
00:04:51.416 --> 00:05:00.663
And if we don't provide that context and don't help people understand the strategy behind the messaging that's been developed, they will not be able to use it effectively.
00:05:01.276 --> 00:05:04.367
And you'll be frustrated and your team will be frustrated.
00:05:04.786 --> 00:05:08.447
And there will be missed opportunities to engage decision makers.
00:05:08.843 --> 00:05:14.274
Because you didn't give your team what they needed to be as ninja about this as you've become.
00:05:15.189 --> 00:05:20.610
So today, we're going to talk about how you transfer your messaging ninja-ness to your team.
00:05:21.089 --> 00:05:24.000
Or at least set them up to be ninjas in training.
00:05:24.677 --> 00:05:26.867
So there's going to be two components to this.
00:05:27.346 --> 00:05:31.007
One is how you share your whole pile of messaging with your team.
00:05:31.353 --> 00:05:34.723
You know, people have to be able to come back to it and refer to it repeatedly.
00:05:34.723 --> 00:05:36.853
So you definitely have to write it down.
00:05:37.363 --> 00:05:41.684
But there's ways to write it down that are easy to absorb and will make sense to people.
00:05:42.134 --> 00:05:47.144
And there's ways to do it that will cause them to quickly get into overwhelm and shut down.
00:05:47.956 --> 00:05:53.206
The other is how you share and teach your team about the strategy behind the messaging.
00:05:53.687 --> 00:06:00.706
How it was developed, where it came from and how to deploy it effectively in different settings with different objectives.
00:06:01.007 --> 00:06:02.206
And different audiences.
00:06:02.884 --> 00:06:07.377
So first, let's talk about how you can share the strategy behind the messaging.
00:06:07.910 --> 00:06:09.439
What is this messaging for?
00:06:09.470 --> 00:06:11.269
What's it designed to accomplish?
00:06:11.870 --> 00:06:14.180
And there's two pieces to the strategy.
00:06:14.697 --> 00:06:20.218
One is the overarching strategy of what we're trying to help decision makers understand overall.
00:06:20.790 --> 00:06:26.401
And the second is in any given setting, depending on what action we want that decision maker to take.
00:06:26.714 --> 00:06:29.685
Then there becomes a specific objective related to that.
00:06:29.745 --> 00:06:32.355
And that shifts how we focus some of our messaging.
00:06:33.177 --> 00:06:38.197
The best way to help your team get their arms around this strategic thinking behind the messaging.
00:06:38.550 --> 00:06:45.240
Is to engage them in some basic questions around a couple of well understood objectives that the organization has.
00:06:45.961 --> 00:06:50.081
Let's say you're working on getting city funding for one of your programs.
00:06:50.677 --> 00:06:58.495
So using that as your anchor, take your team through an abbreviated analysis of your strategy in that situation.
00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:00.680
Who are the key decision makers?
00:07:01.011 --> 00:07:02.990
What is our current relationship with them?
00:07:03.380 --> 00:07:08.600
What do we know about them in terms of how they view the problem we solve our solution and our work.
00:07:08.987 --> 00:07:10.427
The impact that it has.
00:07:10.487 --> 00:07:12.767
How do they value that work and impact?
00:07:13.298 --> 00:07:16.341
And what's in the way of them saying yes to our ask?
00:07:16.975 --> 00:07:21.264
You can go through that conversation in relatively abbreviated form.
00:07:21.264 --> 00:07:23.995
And of course, you're going to wind up supplying some of the answers.
00:07:24.235 --> 00:07:31.447
But at least you're taking them through the strategic thinking process of, first of all, what's our strategy for getting the result we want.
00:07:31.478 --> 00:07:34.088
And then messaging is part of that strategy.
00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:39.310
Which is designed to take the decision-makers from where they are now to yes.
00:07:39.925 --> 00:07:43.151
Each messaging component has a strategic purpose.
00:07:43.511 --> 00:07:48.790
It's designed to help someone who is already somewhat aligned, move closer toward wanting to help you.
00:07:49.331 --> 00:07:57.521
Or it's designed to dismantle a belief or a thought or an objection the decision maker has, that's keeping them from taking the action that you want.
00:07:58.661 --> 00:08:08.170
Your team needs to understand that every single point in your messaging structure is designed strategically to achieve one or both of those purposes.
00:08:08.860 --> 00:08:12.490
And that's just getting them to understand where the messaging came from.
00:08:13.250 --> 00:08:20.785
Then you want to take the team through the different components of your messaging that would be deployed in that engagement process.
00:08:21.504 --> 00:08:21.894
Right.
00:08:22.134 --> 00:08:25.824
First, they get the strategy of how you're going to go after the thing you want.
00:08:26.245 --> 00:08:30.925
And then you say, and this is how the messaging works with that strategy.
00:08:31.581 --> 00:08:39.620
And it's important to point out to your team that you won't be using all of your messaging in any given situation.
00:08:40.071 --> 00:08:42.201
You use what the situation calls for.
00:08:43.100 --> 00:08:49.160
Another thing that's absolutely critical for your team to understand is that messaging is never completely finished.
00:08:49.715 --> 00:08:57.904
You take a risk when you share your beautifully developed messaging with your team and present it as, this is now the official messaging.
00:08:58.924 --> 00:09:07.504
I would beg you to reframe that as, this is our current best messaging that we have found to be most effective so far.
00:09:08.674 --> 00:09:17.225
Make sure your team understands that messaging is always evolving in response to a variety of changing circumstances.
00:09:18.034 --> 00:09:23.768
Now that doesn't mean that you're going to dump it out the window one day and replace it with something brand new.
00:09:24.067 --> 00:09:36.577
It just means that it's a process of continuous improvement as more testing is done and more understanding is developed and more feedback is received in the form of decision-maker reactions to your messaging.
00:09:37.390 --> 00:09:41.910
We continue to make refinements to make it even better and even more dialed in.
00:09:42.061 --> 00:09:44.280
You are never done with that process.
00:09:44.778 --> 00:09:48.451
It's important for the team to understand this for two reasons.
00:09:48.900 --> 00:09:54.301
One, they should not treat this messaging as something that was handed down on stone tablets.
00:09:54.750 --> 00:09:57.331
And that they should just memorize and then go forward.
00:09:57.965 --> 00:10:06.878
And two, they'll be a lot more bought into this whole messaging thing, if you help them understand that they're now part of the testing crew too.
00:10:07.298 --> 00:10:10.207
They're part of the continuous improvement process.
00:10:10.998 --> 00:10:20.087
You want to make sure your team understands that as they're deploying this messaging in conversation with decision makers, they are going to be receiving feedback.
00:10:20.567 --> 00:10:24.408
They're going to be making observations, noticing what lands and what doesn't.
00:10:24.768 --> 00:10:29.118
Noticing what adaptations they're making on the fly that either works or doesn't.
00:10:29.565 --> 00:10:30.705
Mistakes will be made.
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:33.730
They are part of the refinement process.
00:10:34.541 --> 00:10:40.600
And it is their responsibility to do that adaptation and adjustment in real time with a decision-maker.
00:10:41.201 --> 00:10:43.721
And then to share back what they've observed and learned.
00:10:44.254 --> 00:10:50.644
And then all of that comes back in a debriefing process that then contributes to continuous refinement of the messaging.
00:10:51.581 --> 00:10:53.520
But if you don't make that clear to your team.
00:10:53.780 --> 00:10:59.750
That it is both a continuous refinement process and that they have a role in that refinement process.
00:11:00.174 --> 00:11:05.541
You're missing a huge opportunity to improve your messaging, and to empower your team.
00:11:06.274 --> 00:11:19.575
Ultimately what you want is a whole bunch of people on your team who are just as good as you are at engaging decision makers and developing relationships and utilizing super effective messaging to get results.
00:11:20.024 --> 00:11:24.164
The whole point of all this, is to get the results we're looking for.
00:11:25.221 --> 00:11:28.825
So understanding the strategy behind the messaging is key.
00:11:29.335 --> 00:11:35.424
And it will really help your team understand why they would use certain messaging in different situations.
00:11:36.345 --> 00:11:40.544
But before you launch your team to go deploy this messaging out in the world.
00:11:41.054 --> 00:11:45.195
They need an opportunity to practice in a low risk environment.
00:11:45.807 --> 00:11:51.927
So I know people generally don't like role-play, but this is a really good use of role-play.
00:11:52.548 --> 00:12:08.461
And you and any other experienced, very effective messengers in the organization should be the ones who play the role of decision maker with the members of your team who are learning this skill and/or who are working with messaging that is new to them.
00:12:09.197 --> 00:12:17.837
And one thing you can do to accelerate learning and make people feel less put on the spot is to do a couple of demonstration role-plays first.
00:12:18.168 --> 00:12:24.827
So your team can see and hear some examples of how to use the messaging effectively before you ask them to give it a try.
00:12:25.128 --> 00:12:29.748
It takes a lot of the discomfort out of roleplay if you do a couple of good demos first.
00:12:30.138 --> 00:12:33.288
And do it a little bit lightheartedly so that people loosen up.
00:12:33.618 --> 00:12:38.028
I'm sure you've worked with this before and you know how this goes, but people do have resistance.
00:12:38.447 --> 00:12:41.057
And yet it is so valuable in this context.
00:12:42.138 --> 00:12:49.648
You might also want to, and I really recommend this, create a series of very short role-play videos.
00:12:50.248 --> 00:12:52.429
And you can do this with minimal effort.
00:12:52.831 --> 00:12:58.410
I'm talking, get out your phone, park it on a tripod, turn on the camera and start filming.
00:12:59.118 --> 00:13:08.057
And you could do something as simple as a series on how to respond to particular questions or remarks that decision makers commonly voice.
00:13:08.508 --> 00:13:10.488
And how you engage them around that.
00:13:11.298 --> 00:13:21.908
And then video the role play between you and somebody else so that people can hear how you're using your voice, and how you're working with the decision maker to bring about improved understanding.
00:13:22.778 --> 00:13:25.268
These videos do not need to be polished.
00:13:25.538 --> 00:13:30.668
The purpose is to give folks a chance to go back and watch the demos more than once.
00:13:31.028 --> 00:13:33.788
So they can really take in all that nuance.
00:13:34.028 --> 00:13:36.908
There's a lot going on, even in a short role-play.
00:13:37.284 --> 00:13:40.398
And it takes more than one time through to catch all of it.
00:13:41.321 --> 00:13:48.370
And one of the things that I see happen a lot when people are handed a stack of talking points and told here's the messaging, make sure you say this stuff.
00:13:48.841 --> 00:13:52.081
Is that, first of all, they think they're supposed to deliver all the talking points.
00:13:52.260 --> 00:13:56.010
And we know that not all of them will be appropriate in any given conversation.
00:13:56.640 --> 00:14:01.600
But the biggest problem is what's missing from a set of talking points on a page.
00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:07.370
What's missing is the nuance of how you then bring that talking point to life.
00:14:07.671 --> 00:14:18.291
With a combination of how you use your voice, how you support a point and provide context, tell a story, based on how you see the decision-maker reacting.
00:14:18.921 --> 00:14:21.051
You cannot communicate that in writing.
00:14:21.860 --> 00:14:26.931
People have to see and hear that to understand what it looks like, what it sounds like.
00:14:27.260 --> 00:14:30.051
And how it feels to be in that kind of an interaction.
00:14:30.711 --> 00:14:39.801
When you skip that step, what I see over and over again is then when people are handed talking points, they turn into nervous little robots and it's a mess.
00:14:40.370 --> 00:14:49.221
So then they either catch themselves being nervous little robots and jettison the talking points altogether because trying to stick to them is making them freak out.
00:14:49.701 --> 00:14:54.951
Or they stay in nervous robot mode and the conversation goes very poorly.
00:14:55.760 --> 00:14:59.571
Not because the content of the messaging was bad or wrong.
00:14:59.900 --> 00:15:02.870
Those might've been exactly the perfect talking points.
00:15:03.471 --> 00:15:11.480
But if they're not deployed in a way that engages and pulls the decision maker into a conversation, then that's going to have minimal value.
00:15:12.197 --> 00:15:16.368
I don't know how many different ways there are to say this, but I feel like I have to keep saying it.
00:15:16.955 --> 00:15:20.254
That you can't just spray decision makers with information.
00:15:20.764 --> 00:15:22.144
It does not work.
00:15:22.715 --> 00:15:29.077
And in fact it often produces the unintended effect of pushing them away and causing them to disengage.
00:15:29.701 --> 00:15:35.010
As you know from your own experience, we are all drowning in information.
00:15:35.311 --> 00:15:41.941
There's so freaking much information coming at us 24 7, it's all we can do not to just scream at it to stop.
00:15:42.510 --> 00:15:45.841
And so instead of screaming, what we do is we simply shut down.
00:15:45.990 --> 00:15:47.221
We stop taking it in.
00:15:47.640 --> 00:15:48.990
It's out of survival.
00:15:49.380 --> 00:15:54.211
Human beings are not built to drink from an information fire hose, 24 hours a day.
00:15:54.955 --> 00:16:05.918
So for a conversation with the decision maker, where your goal is to move them toward taking a specific action that you need them to take, engagement is the name of the game.
00:16:06.638 --> 00:16:10.388
And you don't engage someone by reciting messaging points to them.
00:16:10.868 --> 00:16:14.677
You engage someone by pulling them into the conversation.
00:16:15.248 --> 00:16:17.378
So you have to teach that part too.
00:16:17.768 --> 00:16:19.628
And demonstrate what that looks like.
00:16:19.988 --> 00:16:27.518
Show your team how you would weave your messaging point into a conversation with the decision maker.
00:16:28.398 --> 00:16:37.711
What your team members ultimately need to be able to do when they become good at this, is to mix and match from the entire messaging ecosystem for the organization.
00:16:38.370 --> 00:16:44.937
To pull together the set of messaging that's most likely to be effective given where they are in the conversation.
00:16:44.937 --> 00:16:47.278
Where they are in the relationship with the decision-maker.
00:16:47.634 --> 00:16:50.934
What they already know about how aligned that decision maker is or not.
00:16:51.571 --> 00:16:57.451
But we also have in our mind, all the messaging around the counters to the objections and all of that.
00:16:57.451 --> 00:17:09.211
So that if the decision-maker surprises us and says something we didn't expect them to say, we have a way to engage them around that that uses our messaging and moves them toward our eventual desired action.
00:17:10.020 --> 00:17:17.211
To do that, your team members need to do some very specific things with all of the messaging you've developed already.
00:17:17.810 --> 00:17:22.040
They need a way to learn it so that it is fully integrated in their brain.
00:17:22.397 --> 00:17:25.587
And is accessible to them in a conversation.
00:17:26.397 --> 00:17:30.837
And they have to not only learn the messaging, they have to learn what it's for and when to use it.
00:17:32.057 --> 00:17:35.897
I'm going to offer you a mental image that I think is extremely helpful for this.
00:17:36.167 --> 00:17:38.057
And that's good old flashcards.
00:17:38.718 --> 00:17:43.530
Basically, your messaging structure is really a series of flashcards, when you think about it.
00:17:43.800 --> 00:17:51.060
It's messaging points that were designed for a specific purpose where each one is designed to accomplish something with a specific audience.
00:17:51.631 --> 00:17:57.990
And so if you can organize your messaging according to that, It will be much more usable by your team.
00:17:58.634 --> 00:18:08.234
And what I find very useful as an initial tool is to create a matrix that outlines your messaging in a way that facilitates that kind of cross referencing.
00:18:09.075 --> 00:18:12.468
You set it up with your four main areas of messaging.
00:18:13.038 --> 00:18:22.141
The problem you solve and why it matters, how you solve the problem and why your solution is unique in some way, the impact of your solution and the value of that impact.
00:18:22.894 --> 00:18:34.994
Then you break out your main types of framing, which typically are around how it affects the individual and their family, how it affects the community and society, and cost benefit analysis.
00:18:35.607 --> 00:18:39.367
And then you layer in the issues you often run into with decision-makers.
00:18:39.397 --> 00:18:43.538
Which no matter what niche you're in, tend to fall into three categories.
00:18:44.000 --> 00:18:45.500
Common misunderstandings.
00:18:46.070 --> 00:18:47.300
Common objections.
00:18:47.750 --> 00:18:51.500
And beliefs that would get in the way of agreement or getting to yes.
00:18:52.407 --> 00:18:59.397
So having all of that in a matrix overview can be super helpful as a map of your messaging ecosystem.
00:19:00.028 --> 00:19:06.508
But beyond that you need something to help your team, get their hands dirty and work with these components to learn how to use them.
00:19:07.055 --> 00:19:11.365
And this is where creating some version of flashcards is so helpful.
00:19:11.815 --> 00:19:20.875
So people can mix and match and play with pulling together a messaging approach for a given conversation with a given decision maker at any given time.
00:19:21.674 --> 00:19:26.394
And one of the fun ways you can do this is you can set up a bunch of scenarios.
00:19:26.758 --> 00:19:32.934
And then the task for the team is to put together the flashcards that go with that scenario.
00:19:33.805 --> 00:19:35.664
And say, okay, this is the messaging we'd want to use.
00:19:35.694 --> 00:19:38.545
Here's what we'd want to be communicating, given the scenario.
00:19:38.755 --> 00:19:40.375
Here's the messaging we would use.
00:19:40.464 --> 00:19:41.515
Now let's build that.
00:19:42.045 --> 00:19:49.694
It's a super helpful way for people to play with this, have fun with it and not only learn how to build messaging.
00:19:50.097 --> 00:19:55.851
But to integrate some of your core messaging so that it is firmly in their brain and accessible at any time.
00:19:56.704 --> 00:19:57.971
So I want to say.
00:19:58.468 --> 00:20:01.461
As you give me the side-eye here and say, I don't have time for this.
00:20:01.857 --> 00:20:04.768
You don't have to be the one to create these flashcards.
00:20:05.211 --> 00:20:06.651
Have your team create them.
00:20:07.025 --> 00:20:12.005
Which again will help them dig into the messaging matrix and begin to integrate it.
00:20:12.994 --> 00:20:18.755
And then if you want to bump up the value one more level, then you go and you have them do the work with the scenarios.
00:20:19.494 --> 00:20:21.805
Your messaging structure is complicated.
00:20:22.285 --> 00:20:26.785
You've got a lot to talk about, and you've got a lot of different types of decision-makers you're working with.
00:20:27.055 --> 00:20:29.515
And you want different actions from different ones.
00:20:30.265 --> 00:20:39.384
And those different types of decision makers tend to have different sets of understanding of the problem and different objections to your ask and are swayed by different kinds of things.
00:20:40.107 --> 00:20:49.621
To help your team navigate that incredible complexity when they're first learning how to do this, you got to give them a lot of support and a lot of ways to learn it.
00:20:50.340 --> 00:20:57.421
The more you can break this down into manageable bits, the more easily they're going to be able to learn it and integrate it.
00:20:57.750 --> 00:21:00.810
And get busy using it, which is what you want.
00:21:01.631 --> 00:21:03.730
This sounds like a lot and it kind of is.
00:21:04.240 --> 00:21:15.790
But the time and care you invest upfront into helping your team fully integrate your most effective messaging and become adept at using it will pay enormous dividends for years to come.
00:21:16.780 --> 00:21:17.740
Thanks for listening.
00:21:18.070 --> 00:21:22.030
And I'll see you in the next episode right here on the Nonprofit Power Podcast.
